Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 10(9): 2404-2413.e1, 2022 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35623576

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The severity of allergic reactions to foods can vary markedly. Little is known of variations in reaction severity within or between individuals or the effects of cofactors. OBJECTIVE: We examined the effects of sleep deprivation and exercise and repeat challenges on the severity and patterns of allergic reactions to peanut. METHODS: In a randomized crossover study, adults with peanut allergy underwent 3 open peanut challenges in random order: with exercise after each dose, with sleep deprivation preceding challenge, and with no intervention. The primary outcome was eliciting dose, reported elsewhere. Reaction severity was a secondary outcome, evaluated using a weighted log-transformed numerical severity score. Analyses estimated the difference in severity between nonintervention challenge and challenges with exercise or sleep deprivation, adjusting for challenge order and using the highest dose tolerated by each individual across all their challenges. Symptom pattern reproducibility was assessed by comparing symptom sequences using pairwise sequence alignment to obtain a percentage match in symptom pattern. RESULTS: Eighty-one participants (mean age 25 y) completed at least 1 postbaseline challenge. Sleep deprivation, but not exercise, significantly increased severity score by 48% (95% CI 12%-84%; P = .009) compared with no intervention. A 38% increase in severity was observed between the first and the last postbaseline challenge (95% CI 1%-75%; P = .044). The average pairwise match of symptoms within individuals was 82.4% and across individuals was 78.3%. CONCLUSIONS: A novel severity score demonstrates that sleep deprivation and repeated challenges increase reaction severity. Understanding factors affecting severity is essential for effective risk management. We also show that symptom patterns in repeat peanut challenges are similar within and between individuals.


Asunto(s)
Arachis , Hipersensibilidad al Cacahuete , Adulto , Alérgenos , Estudios Cruzados , Método Doble Ciego , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad al Cacahuete/diagnóstico , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Privación de Sueño
2.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 6(5): 1692-1698.e1, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29500041

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Serum tryptase is useful in diagnosing drug and venom anaphylaxis. Its utility in food anaphylaxis is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether tryptase rises in food allergic reactions, optimal sampling time points, and a diagnostic cutoff for confirming a clinical reaction. METHODS: Characterized peanut allergic patients were recruited and underwent up to 4 peanut challenges and 1 placebo challenge each. Tryptase was measured serially on challenge days both before (baseline) and during the challenge. The peak percentage tryptase rise (peak/baseline) was related to reaction severity. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated establishing an optimal diagnostic cutoff. RESULTS: Tryptase was analyzed in 160 reactive (9% anaphylaxis) and 45 nonreactive (placebo) challenges in 50 adults aged 18 to 39 years. Tryptase rose above the normal range (11.4 ng/mL) in 4 of 160 reactions. When compared with baseline levels, a rise was observed in 100 of 160 (62.5%) reactions and 0 of 45 placebo challenges. The median rise (95% confidence interval [CI]) for all reactions was 25% (13.3% to 33.3%) and 70.8% (33.3% to 300%) during anaphylaxis. Peak levels occurred at 2 hours and correlated with severity (P < .05). Moderate-to-severe respiratory symptoms, generalized erythema, dizziness, and hypotension were correlated with a higher peak/baseline tryptase (P < .05). ROC curve analysis demonstrated the optimal cutoff to identify a reaction as a 30% rise (sensitivity 0.53; specificity 0.85), area under the curve 0.72 (95% CI, 0.67-0.78). CONCLUSIONS: Serum tryptase measurement is valuable in food allergic reactions, and correlates with symptom severity. Comparing peak reaction levels at 2 hours with baseline is essential. A rise in tryptase of 30% is associated with food allergic reactions.


Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad al Cacahuete/diagnóstico , Triptasas/sangre , Adulto , Alérgenos/inmunología , Anafilaxia/epidemiología , Arachis/inmunología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Hipersensibilidad al Cacahuete/epidemiología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Manejo de Especímenes , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...